Postoperative Outcomes of Pre-Pectoral Versus Sub-Pectoral Implant Immediate Breast Reconstruction.

INTRODUCTION: Immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) techniques are rapidly evolving. We compared the results from a single-center implant IBR cohort between subpectoral and prepectoral implants with and without a mesh. METHODS: We analyzed all complications and grade 2-3 complications, the implant loss rate, the surgery time, the length of stay (LOS), patient satisfaction, the interval time to adjuvant therapy and cost, with a comparison between subpectoral and prepectoral implant IBR. RESULTS: Subpectoral implant IBR was carried out in 529 mastectomies (62.0%) and prepectoral in 324, with a significant increase in prepectoral placement in recent years. Mesh was used in 176 prepectoral placements (54.3%). Any grade of complication was reported in 147 mastectomies (17.2%), with a significantly higher rate for prepectoral implant IBR (p = 0.036). Regression analysis showed that prepectoral implant was not significantly associated with any grade of complication or with grade 2-3 complications. Prepectoral implant IBR was associated with a significantly shorter operative time and lower LOS. Grade 2-3 complications were significantly associated with lower satisfaction. Higher costs were significantly associated with the subpectoral placement and mesh. A complication rate predictive score identified five groups with a significant increase in grade 2-3 complications. CONCLUSIONS: Prepectoral-M-IBR increased over time with no difference in complication rates compared to subpectoral-M-IBR. Prepectoral implant placement can be considered a safe technique.

Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction with Pre-Pectoral or Sub-Pectoral Implant: Assessing Clinical Practice, Post-Surgical Outcomes, Patient's Satisfaction and Cost.

Immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) rates increase during last years and implant-based reconstruction was the most commonly performed procedure. We examined data collected over 25 months to assess complication rate, duration of surgery, patient's satisfaction and cost, according to pre-pectoral or sub-pectoral implant-IBR. All patients who received an implant-IBR, from January 2020 to January 2022, were included. Results were compared between pre-pectoral and sub-pectoral implant-IBR in univariate and multivariate analysis. We performed 316 implant-IBR, 218 sub-pectoral and 98 (31%) pre-pectoral. Pre-pectoral implant-IBR was significantly associated with the year (2021: OR=12.08 and 2022: OR=76.6), the surgeons and type of mastectomy (SSM vs NSM: OR=0.377). Complications and complications Grade 2-3 rates were 12.9% and 10.1% for sub-pectoral implant-IBR respectively, without significant difference with pre-pectoral implant-IBR: 17.3% and 13.2%. Complications Grade 2-3 were significantly associated with age <50-years (OR=2.27), ASA-2 status (OR=3.63) and cup-size >C (OR=3.08), without difference between pre and sub-pectoral implant-IBR. Durations of surgery were significantly associated with cup-size C and >C (OR=1.72 and 2.80), with sentinel lymph-node biopsy and axillary dissection (OR=3.66 and 9.59) and with sub-pectoral implant-IBR (OR=2.088). Median hospitalization stay was 1 day, without difference between pre and sub-pectoral implant-IBR. Cost of surgery was significantly associated with cup-size > C (OR=2.216) and pre-pectoral implant-IBR (OR=8.02). Bad-medium satisfaction and IBR-failure were significantly associated with local recurrence (OR=8.820), post-mastectomy radiotherapy (OR=1.904) and sub-pectoral implant-IBR (OR=2.098). Conclusion: Complications were not different between pre and sub-pectoral implant-IBR. Pre-pectoral implant-IBR seems a reliable and faster technique with better patient satisfaction but with higher cost.

Acute Bartholin's gland abscess treatment by simple needle aspiration: A prospective study.

OBJECTIVE: This study aim was to examine the success rate of simple needle aspiration for acute Bartholin's gland abscess and compare it to incision and drainage treatment. STUDY DESIGN: This was a non-randomised prospective study conducted at the academic Hospital of La Conception, Marseille, France. We included 202 women who presented with acute Bartholin's gland abscess between June 2013 and October 2017. The study cohort was subdivided into two treatment groups, simple needle aspiration (134 women) or incision and drainage (42 women), according to the women's preference. Success was considered as the absence of surgical treatment within one year of the initial treatment. RESULTS: The success rate was 68/134 (51% (95% CI: 42-59%)) in the simple needle aspiration group and 25/42 (60%) in the incision drainage group (RR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.63-1.15, P = 0.3). Among 122/134 (91%) women who completed the satisfaction survey, 99/122 (81%) were satisfied with the simple needle aspiration. CONCLUSIONS: Simple needle aspiration can be offered as first-line treatment for acute Bartholin's gland abscess. Simple needle aspiration can be performed as an outpatient procedure without general anesthesia avoiding surgical treatment in half of the cases one-year post- simple needle aspiration.

Essure removal for device-attributed symptoms: Quality of life evaluation before and after surgical removal.

INTRODUCTION: Increasing reports of adverse effects have raised concerns about the Essure hysteroscopic sterilization method. Women suffering alleged complications of the Essure device often seek surgical removal. This study evaluated the quality of life (QoL) and postoperative outcomes in women undergoing Essure removal. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This observational case series included 95 women. Removal was performed by laparoscopic salpingectomy-cornuectomy, or hysterectomy with bilateral salpingectomy. QoL was assessed preoperatively and three months postoperatively by SF-36 questionnaires [correlated physical health score (PCS) and mental health scores (MCS)]. Symptoms evolution was collected at three months, and complications at one month. RESULTS: Sixty-four laparoscopic salpingectomy-cornuectomies, 33 laparoscopic hysterectomies, and eight vaginal hysterectomies were performed. Four intraoperative complications occurred (one conversion from cornuectomy to laparoscopic hysterectomy, one skin burn, two bladder injuries). Seven postoperative complications occurred (Clavien Dindo, grade 1 or 2). All components of the preoperative QoL scores were lower than those of the general population. PCS scores were lower preoperatively than postoperatively [37.6 versus 50.7; p<0.001]. MCS scores were lower preoperatively than postoperatively [29 versus 52.4; p<0.001]. 71% of patients showed an improvement of at least 10% in both PCS and MCS scores. Systemic and gynecologic symptoms were more frequent before than after surgery (98% versus 50%; p<0.001 and 77% versus 20%; p<0.001 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Patients seeking Essure removal had an impaired preoperative QoL. They experienced a significant QoL improvement at three months post-operation. These findings will help clinicians to inform patients about their expected postoperative functional status and QoL.

EVAN-G score in patients undergoing minimally invasive gynecology oncologic surgery in an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program.

INTRODUCTION: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) has been proven to decrease the length of hospital stay without increasing re-admission rates or complications. There are limited data on the satisfaction of patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic malignancy within ERAS programs. The aim of this study was to evaluate patient satisfaction after minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic malignancy within the ERAS program using the 'Evaluation du Vécu de l'Anésthésie Génerale (EVAN-G)' questionnaire. METHODS: This observational retrospective study was conducted at the Paoli-Calmettes Institute between June 2016 and December 2018. All the included patients underwent minimally invasive surgery for a gynecologic malignancy. EVAN-G, a validated questionnaire, was used to measure peri-operative patient satisfaction. This questionnaire consists of 26 items assessing six elements: attention, privacy, information, pain, discomfort, and waiting time. Each element is assessed via a 5-step numerical scale and then transformed to a 0-100 scale according to the degree of satisfaction. The EVAN-G questionnaire was given to patients before surgery and collected during the post-operative consultation (2-3 weeks after surgery). RESULTS: A total of 175 patients underwent minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic malignancy within the ERAS program. Of these, 92 patients were included in the study and 83 patients were excluded. The overall patient compliance rate with our ERAS program was 90%. The analysis of the EVAN-G score of all participants showed an overall high level of satisfaction with a mean score of 81.9 (range 41.6-100). Patients with peri-operative complications or having prolonged hospitalization also showed high levels of satisfaction with a mean score of 80.5 (41.6-100) and 83.2(55-100), respectively. CONCLUSION: In this study we showed a high patient satisfaction with the ERAS program. When comparing length of stay and complications, neither extended length of stay nor development of complications after minimally invasive surgery impacted patient satisfaction.

Learning Intracorporeal Suture on Pelvitrainer Using a Robotized Versus Conventional Needle Holder.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopy is the gold standard approach in numerous surgical procedures. A new generation of robotized instruments has been developed to compensate for the ergonomic constraints of conventional instruments. The main objective was to compare the learning curves of novices for intracorporeal suturing on a laparoscopy pelvitrainer, using either a robotized needle holder or conventional needle holders. The post-training performances under ergonomically difficult conditions were also analyzed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifth-year medical students were randomized in group A using a robotized needle holder (JAIMY; Endocontrol, Grenoble, France) and group B using straight conventional needle holders. They undertook four training sessions (intracorporeal knot-tying task) followed by an evaluation session (intracorporeal knots-tying task, frontal suture, and hexagonal suture). RESULTS: Twenty participants were included. The performances of the two groups (n = 10) were not significantly different at baseline. During the training sessions, there was a learning curve with a plateau at the third session for both the groups. At the final evaluation session, there was no significant difference between group A and group B for the intracorporeal knot-tying task (median fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery score: 468 versus 474.5 respectively; P = 0.762). There was a significant difference between group A and group B for the frontal suture (median global score: 15.75 versus 3.75 respectively; P = 0.005) but not for the hexagonal suture (median global score: 18 versus 15 respectively; P = 0.284). CONCLUSIONS: Learning curves were equally fast using the robotized needle holder versus conventional instruments and led to equivalent performances. Under ergonomically difficult conditions, the robotized needle holder provided an advantage relative to conventional instruments.

Vaginal Hysterectomy with Salpingectomy for Essure Insert Removal.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of an en-bloc salpingectomy at the time of vaginal hysterectomy for removal of Essure inserts. DESIGN: Prospective observational study (Canadian Task Force classification II-1). SETTING: Monocenter study at the Conception University Hospital Center, Marseille, France. PATIENTS: Women seeking removal of the Essure device and candidate for vaginal hysterectomy from January 1, 2017 to January 31, 2018. INTERVENTIONS: Patient underwent a total hysterectomy and bilateral salpingectomy by the vaginal route (VH-S) with en-bloc removal of each hemiuterus with the ipsilateral fallopian tube, thereby allowing for removal of the Essure inserts without fragmentation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Twenty-six VH-S were performed. There was no converted case to laparoscopy or laparotomy because of issues regarding feasibility or complications. Removal of each hemiuterus with the ipsilateral tube as a single unit was feasible in all cases. There was 1 Clavien-Dindo grade 1 perioperative complication: a bladder injury that required 10days of urinary catheterization. There were 2 grade 2 postoperative complications: 1 case of metrorrhagia of a granuloma on the vaginal fundus that was treated with silver nitrate and 1 case of acute urinary retention that required urinary catheterization for 24hours. CONCLUSION: Performing a VH-S with en-bloc removal of the hemiuterus with the ipsilateral tube without fragmentation orsectioning of the Essure inserts appears to be feasible. The vaginal route can hence be an approach for women who undergo hysterectomy during Essure insert surgery removal.